Difference between revisions of "Morphic Field"
| [checked revision] | [checked revision] |
(Created page with "This is an empty page to create content. Please write your article here. For advice how to edit, please use the Help in the menu or see here: http://www.freewiki.eu/en/index....") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | {{Fragment}} | |
| − | + | The term "morphic fields" or "morphogenetic fields" was coined by the biologist [[Rupert_Sheldrake|Rupert Sheldrake]]. In ''A New Science of Life'' (1981) Sheldrake presents his ''Hypothesis of Forming Causation'' or ''Morphic Resonance'', which postulates the existence of so-called ''morphogenetic fields'' which influence the development of form in nature. | |
| − | + | ||
| + | The biologist [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Portmann Adolf Portmann] also expressed basically similar ideas on shape formation in plants and animals <ref>Adolf Portmann: An den Grenzen des Wissens, Econ, Vienna 1974, p. 136ff and elsewhere, ISBN 3-430-17599-2</ref>. And there are similarities to the anthroposophical idea of a shape-forming [https://anthrowiki.at/Ätherleib formative forces body] or etheric body of all organisms and to certain views of [https://anthrowiki.at/Goetheanismus Goethean Science]. Ultimately, the concept stands in the tradition of [[Vitalism|Vitalism]], but expands it to a much more comprehensive regularity and places the emphasis not on energy but on formation in the sence of an informational field, which in many respects has a greater explanatory value. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Since the first proposal in 1981, Sheldrake's hypothesis has undergone various extensions. For example, morphogenetic fields should not only extend to forms, but to the “laws” of nature themselves, which thus become "habits of nature". With the morphogenetic fields Sheldrake gives an extended meaning to a term from developmental biology coined in the 1920s. Following on from the morphogenetic fields, Sheldrake investigated the extrasensory abilities of humans and animals. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sheldrake's model of ''morphogenetic fields''' has found a very broad acceptance in philosophically open-minded circles, especially in the 90s in the so-called [[New Age movement|New Age movement]], and has since served – also independently and outside the scientific version presented by himself – as a popular explanatory model for many connections between spirit and nature. | ||
| + | |||
| + | | ||
| + | |||
| + | == References == | ||
| + | |||
| + | <references /> | ||
Revision as of 08:42, 22 August 2019
This page has to be considered as a fragment. Some information on the topic has already been collected, but it does not fully cover the subject or may even be far from doing so. Further contributions about this subject are still desired. If you need help or explanations please see our Processing aids or Help in the menu on the left, or write an email.
The term "morphic fields" or "morphogenetic fields" was coined by the biologist Rupert Sheldrake. In A New Science of Life (1981) Sheldrake presents his Hypothesis of Forming Causation or Morphic Resonance, which postulates the existence of so-called morphogenetic fields which influence the development of form in nature.
The biologist Adolf Portmann also expressed basically similar ideas on shape formation in plants and animals [1]. And there are similarities to the anthroposophical idea of a shape-forming formative forces body or etheric body of all organisms and to certain views of Goethean Science. Ultimately, the concept stands in the tradition of Vitalism, but expands it to a much more comprehensive regularity and places the emphasis not on energy but on formation in the sence of an informational field, which in many respects has a greater explanatory value.
Since the first proposal in 1981, Sheldrake's hypothesis has undergone various extensions. For example, morphogenetic fields should not only extend to forms, but to the “laws” of nature themselves, which thus become "habits of nature". With the morphogenetic fields Sheldrake gives an extended meaning to a term from developmental biology coined in the 1920s. Following on from the morphogenetic fields, Sheldrake investigated the extrasensory abilities of humans and animals.
Sheldrake's model of morphogenetic fields' has found a very broad acceptance in philosophically open-minded circles, especially in the 90s in the so-called New Age movement, and has since served – also independently and outside the scientific version presented by himself – as a popular explanatory model for many connections between spirit and nature.
References
- ↑ Adolf Portmann: An den Grenzen des Wissens, Econ, Vienna 1974, p. 136ff and elsewhere, ISBN 3-430-17599-2
