Difference between revisions of "Talk:789 - 1. Statement"
(→Arguments pro and con Homeopathy: new section) |
(here is a test) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
== Arguments pro and con Homeopathy == | == Arguments pro and con Homeopathy == | ||
| − | Here is an article by Paul, which is a brillant analysis of arguments against the working of Hpathy: http://www.drpaultheriault.com/2018/02/25/propaganda-fake-news-and-homeopathy-explained/ | + | Here is an article by Paul, which is a brillant analysis of arguments against the working of Hpathy: [http://www.drpaultheriault.com/2018/02/25/propaganda-fake-news-and-homeopathy-explained/ http://www.drpaultheriault.com/2018/02/25/propaganda-fake-news-and-homeopathy-explained/] |
Revision as of 14:50, 1 September 2018
Andreas:
Here we also need to mention scientific proof an refer to the next point
Quote from the French minister of health saying something like: no point forbidding homeopathy if it does not work it will die out, if it works it will persist even if I forbid it ???? Ref ????
Some homeopathy quotes: https://ehomoeopathy.wordpress.com/2010/07/22/sayings-of-some-great-people-about-homoeopathy/
Arguments pro and con Homeopathy
Here is an article by Paul, which is a brillant analysis of arguments against the working of Hpathy: http://www.drpaultheriault.com/2018/02/25/propaganda-fake-news-and-homeopathy-explained/
