Difference between revisions of "Talk:789 - 1. Statement"

From FreeWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(here is a test)
(new ideas test: new section)
Line 13: Line 13:
  
 
Here is an article by Paul, which is a brillant analysis of arguments against the working of Hpathy: [http://www.drpaultheriault.com/2018/02/25/propaganda-fake-news-and-homeopathy-explained/ http://www.drpaultheriault.com/2018/02/25/propaganda-fake-news-and-homeopathy-explained/]  
 
Here is an article by Paul, which is a brillant analysis of arguments against the working of Hpathy: [http://www.drpaultheriault.com/2018/02/25/propaganda-fake-news-and-homeopathy-explained/ http://www.drpaultheriault.com/2018/02/25/propaganda-fake-news-and-homeopathy-explained/]  
 +
 +
== new ideas test ==
 +
 +
 

Revision as of 14:59, 1 September 2018

Andreas:

Here we also need to mention scientific proof an refer to the next point

Quote from the French minister of health saying something like: no point forbidding homeopathy if it does not work it will die out, if it works it will persist even if I forbid it ???? Ref ????

Some homeopathy quotes: https://ehomoeopathy.wordpress.com/2010/07/22/sayings-of-some-great-people-about-homoeopathy/

 

Arguments pro and con Homeopathy

Here is an article by Paul, which is a brillant analysis of arguments against the working of Hpathy: http://www.drpaultheriault.com/2018/02/25/propaganda-fake-news-and-homeopathy-explained/  

new ideas test