Difference between revisions of "Talk:789 - 5. Statement"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Jörg: REASONS WHY HOMEOPATHY CAN NOT BE PLACEBO! is not a statement. | + | <span style="color:#c0392b">Jörg</span>: REASONS WHY HOMEOPATHY CAN NOT BE PLACEBO! is not a statement. |
---- | ---- | ||
| − | == Andreas: Material on Placebo == | + | == <span style="color:#c0392b">Andreas</span>: Material on Placebo == |
'''WE COULD HAVE A PAGE HERE WITH INFO ABOUT THE HISTORY OF PLACEBO AND THE QUESTIONS ABOUT IT:''' | '''WE COULD HAVE A PAGE HERE WITH INFO ABOUT THE HISTORY OF PLACEBO AND THE QUESTIONS ABOUT IT:''' | ||
| − | Joerg: | + | <span style="color:#c0392b">Joerg</span>: Actually there is a Wiki-page already to work on: [[Placebo|Placebo]] |
| + | [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1297390/pdf/jrsocmed00004-0023.pdf https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1297390/pdf/jrsocmed00004-0023.pdf] | ||
| − | + | [https://placeboarchive.org/data-forte/history/ https://placeboarchive.org/data-forte/history/ [https://www.nursingschoolhub.com/placebo-effect/ https://www.nursingschoolhub.com/placebo-effect/] | |
| − | + | '''About lack of reporting placebo content'''<br/> Golomb BA, Erickson LC, Koperski S mfl. What’s in placebos: Who knows? Analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Ann Intern Med 2010; 153: 532-5. | |
| − | |||
| − | '''About lack of reporting placebo content | ||
| | ||
Revision as of 19:59, 20 August 2018
Jörg: REASONS WHY HOMEOPATHY CAN NOT BE PLACEBO! is not a statement.
Andreas: Material on Placebo
WE COULD HAVE A PAGE HERE WITH INFO ABOUT THE HISTORY OF PLACEBO AND THE QUESTIONS ABOUT IT:
Joerg: Actually there is a Wiki-page already to work on: Placebo
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1297390/pdf/jrsocmed00004-0023.pdf
About lack of reporting placebo content
Golomb BA, Erickson LC, Koperski S mfl. What’s in placebos: Who knows? Analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Ann Intern Med 2010; 153: 532-5.
The debate about placebo in the Lancet
Saintonge C de, Mark D, Herxheimer A. Harnessing placebo effects in health care. Lancet 1994; 344: 995-8.
Johnson AG. Surgery as placebo. Lancet 1994; 344: 1140-2.
Thomas KB. The placebo in general practice. Lancet 1994; 344:1066-7.
Laporte JR, Figueras A. Placebo effects in psychiatry. Lancet 1994; 344: 1206-9.
Joyce CRB. Placebo and complementary medicine. Lancet 1944: 1279-81.
Joseph Kleijnen found 1100 publications about placebo
Kleijnen JMP de Craen AJM, van Everdingen J mfl. Placebo effect in double-blind clinical trials: a review of interactions with medications. Lancet 1994; 344: 1347-9.
The famous review (Jean Pierre J )
Hróbjartsson A, Gøtzsche PC. Is the placebo powerless? An analysis of clinical trials comparing placebo with no treatment. New England Journal of Medicine 2001; 344: 1594-602.
Hróbjartsson A, Gøtzsche PC. Placebo interventions for all clinical conditions (Cochrane Review). I: the Cochrane Library 2004; 3. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (oppdatert).
Logic or the lack of it in the definition
Gøtzsche PC. Is there a logic in the placebo? Lancet 1994; 344: 925-6.
Gunver Sophie Kienle and Helmut Kiene review of 800 publication
Kienle GS. Der sogenannte Placeboeffekt. Illusion, Fakten, Realität. Stuttgart, BRD: Schattauer Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, 1995.
Kienle GS, Kiene H. Placebo effect and placebo concept: A critical methodological and conceptual analysis of reports on the magnitude of the placebo effect. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine 1996; 2: 39-54.
Kienle GS. Kritische Analyse der wissenschaftlichen Basis des sogenannten Placeboeffekts. Bedeutung des Placeboarguments für die Erfahrungsheilkunde. Acta Medica Empirica (Erfahrungsheilkunde) 1997; 5: 298-306.
Kienle GS, Kiene H. The powerful placebo effect: fact or fiction? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1997; 50: 1311-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9449934
THE START OF IT ALL – (BEVARE OF ALL THE PITFALLS _ WE CAN MENTION A LOT HERE – TELL ME IF WE SHOULD AND I WILL ADD)
Beecher HK. The powerful placebo. Journal of The American Medical Association 1955; 159: 1602-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13271123
THE FIRST CONTROLLED TRIAL – INVOLVES HOMEOPATHY; Joseph Dietl (1804-78) in 1849 – he only used ant tart. Comparing venesection, diet and homeopathy)https://archive.org/details/b21710429
